The role of skin colour in camouflage: experiment with green plasticine models of the European tree frog Hyla arborea

Jenő J. Purger; Bianka Pál-Dittrich; Dávid Szép; Krisztián Samu

doi:10.26496/bjz.2025.196

Authors

Jenő J. Purger Department of Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Ifjúság útja 6, Hungary https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3302-6544
Bianka Pál-Dittrich Department of Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Ifjúság útja 6, Hungary https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7667-2741
Dávid Szép Department of Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Ifjúság útja 6, Hungary https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9749-9159
Krisztián Samu Department of Mechatronics, Optics and Engineering Informatics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1111 Budapest, Műegyetem rkp. 3, Hungary https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1801-8757

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26496/bjz.2025.196

Keywords:

crypsis, daily survival rate, different background, predation, spectral reflection

Abstract

The role of skin colour variations in the survival of European tree frogs is unknown. We presumed that green frogs become more noticeable to predators in the autumn when the colour of the leaves changes. For the study of their survival chance, we made plasticine models of European tree frogs with the same shape and the same dominant colour spectrum of 550 nm. The experiment was conducted in autumn 2018 in three vegetation types with varied backgrounds (vineyard, bulrush belts and reed bed) and in the habitat with a permanent background (concrete wall). In our experiment lasting more than a month we used 50 green coloured tree frog plasticine models in every habitat. Only 10% of the models were damaged by predators. Daily survival rates were high in all habitats (above 99%), and predation pressure on the concrete wall was significantly higher than in the different vegetation types. This was caused by the fact that the colour contrast of frog models on concrete walls (13.3) was twice as high as on grape (6.8), bulrush (4.2), or reed (5.0) leaves. Predators in the vineyard, bulrush belts and reed bed were mostly birds which left traces primarily on the heads of the models, while on the models displayed on the wall most of the traces (on the trunk and limbs) were left by mammals (small mammals, red foxes, and domestic cats). The colour spectrum of the vegetation background of the European tree frog models changed to brownish in autumn, but predation pressure did not increase. The constant green colour of the European tree frog models in natural habitats did not affect predation, from which we conclude that the colour variants may have other functions besides camouflage.

References

Akiyama K., Watanabe K., Fukui M., Higuchi H. & Noda T. (2019). Quantitative evaluation of digital-image enhancement during heads-up surgery. Scientific Reports 9: 15931. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52492-z

Bateman P.W., Fleming P.A. & Wolfe A.K. (2017). A different kind of ecological modelling: the use of clay model organisms to explore predator-prey interactions in vertebrates. Journal of Zoology 301 (4): 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12415

Bennett A.T.D. & Théry M. (2007). Avian color vision and coloration: multidisciplinary evolutionary biology. American Naturalist 169 (Suppl. 1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/510163

Bennie J.J., Duffy J.P., Inger R. & Gaston K.J. (2014). Biogeography of time partitioning in mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (38): 13727–13732. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216063110

Butet A. & Delettre Y.R. (2011). Diet differentiation between European arvicoline and murine rodents. Acta Theriologica 56 (4): 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-011-0049-6

Caro T., Sherratt T.N. & Stevens M. (2016). The ecology of multiple colour defences. Evolutionary Ecology 30 (5): 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9854-3

Choi N. & Jang Y. (2014). Background matching by means of dorsal color change in treefrog populations (Hyla japonica). Journal of Experimental Zoology, Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology 321 (2): 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1841

Degani G. (2022). Changes in tree frog (Hyla savignyi) coloration in unstable habitats at the southern border of its distribution. Open Journal of Animal Sciences 12: 68–75. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2022.121005

Degani G. & Biton E. (2013). Tree frog (Hyla savygnyi) color and substrate preference. American Open Animal Science Journal 1 (3): 31–39. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259964135 [accessed 6 January 2025].

Dely O.G. (1967). Kétéltűek-Amphibia. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

Đorđević S., Simović A., Krizmanić I. & Tomović L. (2016). Colour variations in the European tree frog, Hyla arborea (Linnaeus, 1758), from two small adjacent ponds in the Vojvodina province, Serbia. Ecologica Montenegrina 5: 18–21. https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2016.5.2

Dreher C.E., Cummings M.E. & Pröhl, H. (2015). An analysis of predator selection to affect aposematic coloration in a poison frog species. PLoS ONE 10 (6): e0130571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130571

Duarte R.C., Flores A.A.V. & Stevens M. (2017). Camouflage through colour change: mechanisms, adaptive value and ecological significance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 372: e20160342. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0342

Grosse W.-R. (2009). Der Laubfrosch Hyla arborea. NBB 615, Westarp Wissenschaften, Hohenwarsleben.

Hegna R.H., Saporito R.A., Gerow K.G. & Donnelly M.A. (2011). Contrasting colors of an aposematic poison frog do not affect predation. Annales Zoologici Fennici 48 (1): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.048.0103

Horváth L. (1945). A pellérdi halastavak madárfaunája – Biocoenotikai és szociológiai állatföldrajzi tanulmány. Dunántúli Tudományos Intézet 6: 1–20.

Johnson D.H. (1979). Estimating nest success: the Mayfield method and an alternative. Auk 96 (4): 651–661. Available from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4085651 [accessed 6 January 2025].

Kang C., Kim Y.E. & Jang Y. (2016). Colour and pattern change against visually heterogeneous backgrounds in the tree frog Hyla japonica. Scientific Reports 6: 22601. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22601

Kazantzidis S. & Goutner V. (2005). The diet of nestlings of three Ardeidae species (Aves, Ciconiiformes) in the Axios Delta, Greece. Belgian Journal of Zoology 135 (2): 165–170.

Kelber A. (2019). Bird colour vision – from cones to perception. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 30: 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.05.003

King R.B., Hauff S. & Phillips J.B. (1994). Physiological color change in the green treefrog: responses to background brightness and temperature. Copeia 1994 (2): 422–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1446990

Koren T. & Jelić D. (2011). Interesting color forms of the European tree frog, Hyla arborea (Linnaeus, 1758) (Amphibia: Ranidae) from Croatia. Hyla 2: 27–29.

Kovács T. & Török J. (1997). Feeding ecology of the common tree frog (Hyla arborea) in a swampland, Western Hungary. Opuscula Zoologica 29-30 (1): 95–102.

Lanszki Z., Purger J.J., Bocz R., Szép D. & Lanszki J. (2019). The stone marten and the red fox consumed predominantly fruits all year round: a case study. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 65 (1): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.17109/AZH.65.1.45.2019

Lawrence J.P., Mahony M. & Noonan B.P. (2018). Differential responses of avian and mammalian predators to phenotypic variation in Australian Brood Frogs. PLoS ONE 13 (4): e0195446. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195446

Macedonia J.M., Lappin A.K., Loew E.R., McGuire J.A., Hamilton P.S., Plasman M., Brandt Y., Lemos-Espinal J.A. & Kemp D.J. (2009). Conspicuousness of Dickerson’s collared lizard (Crotaphytus dickersonae) through the eyes of conspecifics and predators. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 97 (4): 749–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01217.x

Martín J. & López P. (1990). Amphibians and reptiles as prey of birds in Southwestern Europe. Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service 82: 1–43.

Mayfield H.F. (1975). Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bulletin 87 (4): 456–466.

Michalis C., Scott-Samuel N.E., Gibson D.P. & Cuthill I.C. (2017). Optimal background matching camouflage. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 284: 20170709. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0709

Mirč M., Vukov T., Kijanović A. & Tomašević Kolarov N. (2023). Effects of background color on pigmentation, morphological traits, and behavior in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea, Hylidae, Anura) tadpoles. Contributions to Zoology 92 (2): 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-bja10040

Nielsen H.I. (1978). The effect of stress and adrenaline on the color of Hyla cinerea and Hyla arborea. General and Comparative Endocrinology 36 (4): 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(78)90094-1

Noonan B.P. & Comeault A.A. (2009). The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs. Biology Letters 5 (1): 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0586

Ohta N. & Robertson A.R. (2005). Chapter 3. CIE Standard Colorimetric System. In: Colorimetry: Fundamentals and Applications: 63–114. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, West Sussex, England. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470094745.ch3

Ödeen A. & Håstad O. (2013). The phylogenetic distribution of ultraviolet sensitivity in birds. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13: 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-36

Paluh D.J., Hantak M.M. & Saporito R.A. (2014). A test of aposematism in the dendrobatid poison frog Oophaga pumilio: the importance of movement in clay model experiments. Journal of Herpetology 48 (2): 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1670/13-027

Papp J.L. (1974). Ornithologische Angaben über die Fischteiche von Pellérd. Aquila 78–79: 99–106.

Park C., No S., Yoo S., Oh D., Hwang Y., Kim Y. & Kang C. (2023). Testing multiple hypotheses on the colour change of treefrogs in response to various external conditions. Scientific Reports 13: 4203. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31262-y

Pinto F., Mielewczik M., Liebisch F., Walter A., Greven H. & Rasche U. (2013). Non-invasive measurement of frog skin reflectivity in high spatial resolution using a dual hyperspectral approach. PLoS ONE 8 (9): e73234. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073234

Purger J.J. & Gyetvai G. (2001). Amphibian and reptilian casualties on the road crossing at the fishponds of Pellérd. Természetvédelmi Közlemények 9: 265–267.

Purger J.J., Kurucz K., Tóth A. & Batáry P. (2012). Coating plasticine eggs can eliminate the overestimation of predation on artificial ground nests. Bird Study 59 (3): 350–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2012.684550

Purger J.J., Lanszki Z., Szép D. & Bocz R. (2017). Predation of common wall lizards: experiences from a study using scentless plasticine lizards. Acta Herpetologica 12 (2): 181–186. https://doi.org/10.13128/Acta_Herpetol-20339

Radovanović T.B., Petrović T.G., Gavrilović B.R., Despotović S.G., Gavrić J.P., Kijanović A., Mirč M., Tomašević Kolarov N., Vukov T. & Prokić M.D. (2023). What coloration brings: Implications of background adaptation to oxidative stress in anurans. Frontiers in Zoology 20: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-023-00486-z

Saporito R.A., Zuercher R., Roberts M., Gerow K.G. & Donnelly M.A. (2007). Experimental evidence for aposematism in the dendrobatid poison frog Oophaga pumilio. Copeia 2007 (4): 1006–1011. https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2007)7[1006:EEFAIT]2.0.CO;2

Stegen J.C., Gienger C.M. & Sun L. (2004). The control of color change in the Pacific tree frog, Hyla regilla. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82 (6): 889–896. https://doi.org/10.1139/z04-068

Stuart Y.E., Dappen N. & Losin N. (2012). Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness. PLoS ONE 7 (10): e48497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048497

Stuart-Fox D.M., Moussalli A., Marshall N.J. & Owens I.P.F. (2002). Conspicuous males suffer higher predation risk: visual modelling and experimental evidence from lizards. Animal Behaviour 66 (3): 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2235

Széles G.L., Purger J.J., Molnár T. & Lanszki J. (2018). Comparative analysis of the diet of feral and house cats and wildcat in Europe. Mammal Research 63 (1): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-017-0341-1

Toledo L.F. & Haddad C.F.B. (2009). Colors and some morphological traits as defensive mechanisms in anurans. International Journal of Zoology 2009: 910892. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/910892

Umbers K.D.L., Riley J.L., Kelly M.B.J., Taylor-Dalton G., Lawrence J.P. & Byrne P.G. (2020). Educating the enemy: Harnessing learned avoidance behavior in wild predators to increase survival of reintroduced southern corroboree frogs. Conservation Science and Practice 2: e139. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.139

Vazquez B. & Hilje B. (2015). How habitat type, sex, and body region influence predatory attacks on Norops lizards in a pre-montage wet forests in Costa Rica: an approach using clay models. Herpetology Notes 8: 205–212.

Vervust B., Van Loy H. & Van Damme R. (2011). Seeing through the lizard’s trick: do avian predators avoid autotomous tails? Central European Journal of Biology 6 (2): 293–299. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-010-0119-9

Virtanen O., Constantinidou E. & Tyystjärvi E. (2022). Chlorophyll does not reflect green light – how to correct a misconception. Journal of Biological Education 56 (5): 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1858930

Vos C.C. & Stumpel A.H.P. (1995). Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog (Hyla arborea). Landscape Ecology 11: 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071811

Wells K.D. (2007). The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Yeager J., Wooten C. & Summers K. (2011). A new technique for the production of large numbers of clay models for field studies of predation. Herpetological Review 42 (3): 357–359.

Zar J.H. (2010). Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.