Efficiency of live trapping protocols to assess small mammal diversity in tropical rainforests of Sri Lanka

Authors

  • Mayuri R. Wijesinghe Department of Zoology, University of Colombo, Cumaratunga Munidasa Mawatha, Colombo 03, Sri Lanka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26496/bjz.2010.170

Keywords:

duration, live trapping, rainforest, small mammals, Sri Lanka

Abstract

Live trapping is used extensively for small mammal studies in both temperate and tropical ecosystems. The effectiveness of such studies is dependent on several factors. This paper attempts to investigate how one of these factors, namely the trapping intensity, affects the assessment of species richness and abundance of small mammals in rainforest ecosystems in southwest Sri Lanka. Eight-day live trapping surveys were conducted in seven selected forests yielding a total of 5600 trap days with a total of 186 individuals belonging to nine species being captured. It was evident that, using 100 traps with a trap density of 140 traps per ha, over 90% of the species recorded from each of the seven forests were captured within the initial four days of live trapping after which the rate of capture of new species sharply declined. The results also show that the more common species were captured sooner than the more rare ones. Considering these trends, a four-day trapping protocol could be recommended to broadly compare small mammal communities between forests or habitat types. The number of individuals captured, on the other hand, probably attracted by the bait, increased as trapping progressed; this very likely leads to overestimation of species abundance. Since such projects in developing countries are subject to budgetary constraints, costs incurred are also addressed.

References

Alder GH (1994). Tropical forest fragmentation and isolation promote asynchrony of a frugivorous rodent. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63:903-911.

Conard JM, Baumgardt JA, Gipson PS & Althoff DP (2008). The influence of trap density and sampling duration on the detection of small mammal species richness. Acta Theriologica, 53:143-56.

Edalgo JA & Anderson JT (2007). Effects of prebaiting on small mammal trapping success in a morrow's honeysuckle- dominated area. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 71:246-250.

Franci KE, Ford WM & Castleberry SB (2002). Relative efficiency of three small mammal traps in Central Appalachian wetlands. Georgia Journal of Science, 60:192-198.

Gunatilleke CVS & Gunatilleke IUAN (1981). The floristic composition of Sinharaja – a rainforest in Sri Lanka with special reference to endemics and dipterocarps. The Malaysian Forester, 44:386-396.

Jenkins KI, Roberts SI & Seaman DE (2005). Monitoring small mammal populations in coniferous forest ecosystems of Olympic National Park. Forest Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Port Angeles.

Koekemoer AC & Van Aarde RJ (2000). The influence of food supplementation on a coastal dune rodent community. African Journal of Ecology, 38:343-351.

Kotagama SW, Karunaratne PB, Nadaraja A, De Zoysa ND & Kulasekera VL (1986). Faunal studies in the Sinharaja rainforest III. Composition and diversity of small mammal fauna. Proceedings of the forty-second Annual Sessions of the Sri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science, 134-135.

Kozekiewicz M & Jurasinska E (1989). The role of habitat barriers in woodlot recolonization by small mammals. Holarctic Ecolgy, 12:106-111.

Mares MA & Ernest KA (1995). Population and community ecology of small mammals in a gallery forest of Central Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy, 76:750-768.

O’Brien C, McShea W, Guimondou S, Barriere P & Carleton M (2006). Terrestrial small mammals (Soricidae and Muridae) from the Gamba Complex of protected areas, Gabon: Species composition and comparison of sampling techniques. Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington, 12:353-363.

Ratnaweera PB & Wijesinghe MR (2007). Influence of seed abundance on two ground-dwelling murids in the Kanneliya rainforest Proceedings of the 64th Annual Sessions of the Sri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science, Sri Lanka.

Renata P (2004). Effects of forest fragmentation on small mammals in an Atlantic Forest Landscape. Biodiversity Conservation, 13:2567-2586.

Rexstad E. & Debevec E (1999). Small mammal monitoring at the landscape scale: Denali National Park and Preserve. Annual Report, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.

Richards PW (1969). Speciation in the tropical rain forest and the concept of the niche. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1:149-153.

Shanker K (2000). Small mammal trapping in tropical montane forests of the Upper Nilgiris, southern India: An evaluation of capture-recapture models estimating abundance. Journal of Biosciences, 25:99-111.

Solari S, Rodriguez JJ, Vivar E & Velazco PM (2002). A framework for assessment and monitoring of small mammals in a lowland tropical forest. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 76:55-67.

Wijesinghe MR (2001). Habitat selection of endemic vertebrates in Sinharaja, a rainforest in Sri Lanka. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Wijesinghe MR & Brooke M DE L (2004). What causes the vulnerability of endemic animals? A case study from Sri Lanka. Journal of Zoology London, 263:135-140.

Wijesinghe MR & Brooke M DE L (2005). The distribution of small mammals along a disturbance gradient in Sinharaja, Sri Lanka. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21:291-296.

Yáñez MA, Frida V, Simonetti JA & Grez AA (1999). Small mammals of forest islands of the Beni Biological Station, Bolivia. Mastozoología Neotropical, 135-138.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-25

How to Cite

Wijesinghe, M. R. (2024). Efficiency of live trapping protocols to assess small mammal diversity in tropical rainforests of Sri Lanka. Belgian Journal of Zoology, 140(2), 212–215. https://doi.org/10.26496/bjz.2010.170

Issue

Section

Articles