Effects of foraging mode and group pattern on vigilance behavior in water birds: a case study of mallard and black-winged stilt

Chunlin Li; Lizhi Zhou; Hongkai Li; Zhigang Jiang

doi:10.26496/bjz.2011.147

Authors

Chunlin Li Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
Lizhi Zhou College of Life Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei, 230039, China
Hongkai Li Management Committee of Hengshui Lake National Nature Reserve, Hengshui, 053000, China
Zhigang Jiang Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26496/bjz.2011.147

Keywords:

alert distance, Anas platyrhynchos, blind period of foraging, flee distance, Himantopus himantopus

Abstract

Vigilance behavior is affected by many factors including foraging mode and group pattern which we attempted to understand through a case study of mallard Anas platyrhynchos and black-winged stilt Himantopus himantopus in the Hengshui Lake National Nature Reserve, China. Mallard, a swimming bird, forages in irregular and loose circular groups in open water and its foraging mode (with its head underwater looking for food) does not allow for simultaneous monitoring of potential threats above the water surface, which is why its foraging is called “blind period of foraging”. In contrast, black-winged stilt is a wading bird and forages along riversides in long linear foraging groups. Its long beak, neck and legs enable it to scan around while foraging without any obviously blind period. We used the focal sampling method and measured vigilance behavior by the time spent vigilant, vigilance frequency, average duration of vigilance, alert distance and flee distance for the two species. We predicted higher levels of vigilance and longer alert and flee distance in mallard with long blind periods of foraging. Our results indicated significant differences (p<0.05) in vigilance behavior between the two species. The effects of group size and gender on vigilance were also checked but showed no significant differences. Higher-level vigilance in mallard was mainly due to its foraging mode with long ‘blind periods’ and circular foraging group pattern. We suggested that buffer zones be established in ecotourism regions in order to protect birds from human interference.

References

Altmann J (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49: 227-267.

Arenz CL (2003). The group size effect on vigilance: many unanswered questions. Behavioural Processes, 63: 123-124.

Bachman GC (1993). The effect of body condition on the trade-off between vigilance and foraging in Belding’s ground squirrels. Animal Behaviour, 46: 233-244.

Bahr DB & Bekoff M (1999). Predicting flock vigilance from simple passerine interactions: modelling with cellular automata. Animal Behaviour, 58: 831-839.

Beauchamp G (2001). Should vigilance always decrease with group size? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 51: 47-52.

Beauchamp G & Livoreil B (1997). The effect of group size on vigilance and feeding rate in spice finches (Lonchura punctulata). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 75: 1526-1531.

Bekoff M (1995). Vigilance, flock size, and flock geometry: Information gathering by western evening grosbeaks (Aves, Fringillidae). Ethology, 13: 150-161.

Bekoff M (2003). Where’s the brain? Geometric and cognitive underpinnings of group-size effects on vigilance. Behavioural Processes, 63: 139-140.

Benhaiem S, Delon M, Lourtet B, Cargnelutti B, Aulagnier S, Hewison A, Morellet N & Verheyden H (2008). Hunting increases vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies feeding site selection. Animal Behaviour, 76: 611-618.

Boysen AF, Lima SL & Bakken GS (2001). Does the thermal environment influence vigilance behavior in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis)? An approach using standard operative temperature. Jouranl of Thermal Biology, 26: 605-612.

Childress MJ & Lung MA (2003). Predation risk, gender and the group size effect: does elk vigilance depend upon the behaviour of conspecifics? Animal Behaviour, 66: 389-398.

Cooper WE (2008). Visual monitoring of predators: occurrence, cost and benefit for escape. Animal Behaviour, 76: 1365-1372.

Creel S, Winnie Jr JA, Christianson D & Liley S (2008). Time and space in general models of antipredator response: tests with wolves and elk. Animal Behaviour, 76: 1139-1146.

Dias RI (2006). Effects of position and flock size on vigilance and foraging behaviour of the scaled dove Columbina squammata. Behavioural Processes, 73: 248-252.

Elgar MA (1989). Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: A critical review of the empirical evidence. Biological Review, 64: 13-33.

Erwin R (1989). Responses to human intruders by birds nesting in colonies: experimental results and management guidelines. Colonial Waterbirds, 12: 104-108.

Fernández-Juricic E, Beauchamp G & Bastain B (2007). Group-size and distance-to-neighbour effects on feeding and vigilance in brown-headed cowbirds. Animal Behaviour, 73: 771-778.

Fernández-Juricic E, Jimenez M & Lucas E (2002). Alert distance as an alternative measure of bird tolerance to human disturbance: implications for park design. Environmental Conservation, 28: 263-269.

Frid A (1997). Vigilance by female Dall’s sheep: interactions between predation risk factors. Animal Behaviour, 53: 799-808.

Gauthier-Clerc M, Tamisier A & Cézilly F (2000). Sleep-vigilance trade-off in gadwall during the winter period. Condor, 102: 307-313.

Guillemain M, Fritz H & Blais S (2000). Foraging methods can affect patch choice: an experimental study in Mallar (Anas platyrhynchos). Behavioural Processes, 50: 123-129.

Gutzwiller KJ, Marcum HA, Harvey HB, Roth JD & Anderson SH (1998). Bird tolerance to human intrusion in Wyoming Montane forests. Condor, 100: 519-527.

Holmes N, Giese M & Kriwoken LK (2005). Testing the minimum approach distance guidelines for incubating Royal penguins Eudyptes schlegeli. Biology Conservation, 126: 339-350.

Illius AW & Fitzgibbon C (1994). Costs of vigilance in foraging ungulates. Animal Behaviour, 47: 481-484.

Inger R, Bearhop S, Robinson JA & Ruxton G (2006). Prey choice affects the trade-off balance between predation and starvation in an avian herbivore. Animal Behaviour, 71: 1335-1341.

Jones ME (1998). The function of vigilance in sympatric marsupial carnivores: the eastern quoll and the Tasmanian devil. Animal Behaviour, 56: 1279-1284.

Kaby U & Lind J (2003). What limits predator detection in blue tits (Parus caeruleus): posture, task or orientation? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54: 534-538.

Krause J & Godin JGJ (1996). Influence of prey foraging posture on flight behavior and predation risk: predators take advantage of unwary prey. Behavioral Ecology, 7: 264-271.

Lazarus J (2003). Vigilance and group size: early studies, the edge effect, secondary defences, the double advantage trade-off and the future. Behavioural Processes, 63: 129-131.

Li C, Jiang Z, Tang S & Zeng Y (2007). Evidence of effects of human disturbance on alert response in Pere David’s deer (Elaphurus davidianus). Zoo Biology, 26: 461-470.

Li Z & Jiang Z (2008). Group size effect on vigilance: Evidence from Tibetan gazelle in Upper Buha River, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Behavioural Processes, 78: 25-28.

Lima SL & Bednekoff PA (1999). Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack? Animal Behaviour, 58: 537-543.

Makowska I & Kramer D (2007). Vigilance during food handling in grey squirrels, Sciurus carolinensis. Animal Behaviour, 74: 153-158.

Metcalfe NB (1984). The effects of habitat on the vigilance of shorebirds: is visibility important? Animal Behaviour, 32: 981-985.

Öst M, Jaatinen K & Steele B (2007). Aggressive females seize central positions and show increased vigilance in brood-rearing coalitions of eiders. Animal Behaviour, 73: 239-247.

Proctor CJ, Broom M & Ruxton GD (2006). Antipredator vigilance in birds: Modelling the “edge effect”. Mathematical Biosciences, 199: 79-96.

Rolando A, Caldoni R, De Sanctis A & Laiolo P (2001). Vigilance and neighbour distance in foraging flocks of red-billed choughs, Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax. Journal of Zoology, 253: 225-232.

Sirot E (2006). Social information, antipredatory vigilance and flight in bird flocks. Animal Behaviour, 72: 373-382.

Taylor AR & Knight RL (2003). Wildlife responses to recreation and associated visitor perceptions. Ecological Application, 13: 951-963.

Treves A (2000). Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation. Animal Behaviour, 60: 711-722.

Treves A (2003). Modeling vigilance remains unrealistic. Behavioural Processes, 63: 137-138.

Walther FR (1969). Flight behaviour and avoidance of predators in thomson’s gazelle (Gazella Thomsoni Guenther 1884). Behaviour, 34: 184-220.

Wang Y, Chen S & Ding P (2004). Flush distance: bird tolerance to human intrusion in Hangzhou. Zoological Research, 25: 214-220.

Welp T, Rushen J, Kramer DL, Festa-Bianchet M & de Passill AMB (2004). Vigilance as a measure of fear in dairy cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 87: 1-13.

White KS & Berger J (2001). Antipredator strategies of Alaskan moose: are maternal trade-offs influenced by offspring activity? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79: 2055-2062.

Wolff JO & Van Horn T (2003). Vigilance and foraging patterns of American elk during the rut in habitats with and without predators. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81: 266-271.

Zhang Y, Wu Y, Wu M, Li D, Gao Q, Jia F, Lv S & Liu Z (2003). Observation on breeding habits of Himantopus himatopus in Nandagang of Hebei province. Chinese Journal of Zoology. 38: 103-105.