The impact of sward height, forage quality and competitive conditions on foraging behaviour of free-ranging rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.)

Nele Somers; Tanja Milotić; Maurice Hoffmann

doi:10.26496/bjz.2012.140

Authors

Nele Somers Ghent University, Dept. Biology, Terrestrial Ecology Unit, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
Tanja Milotić Ghent University, Dept. Biology, Terrestrial Ecology Unit, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
Maurice Hoffmann Ghent University, Dept. Biology, Terrestrial Ecology Unit, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26496/bjz.2012.140

Keywords:

rabbit, forage quality, vegetation height, crude protein

Abstract

The habitat choice of the small hindgut fermenter, the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.), was studied in relation to sward height, forage quality, population size fluctuations and spatial distribution of burrows in a temperate grassland. In a multi-phase differential clipping experiment with alternating short and tall vegetation strips, rabbits tended to graze near the closest burrows in situations of equal vegetation heights, while a clear preference for short swards was found during summer (July). In this period, general crude protein content was significantly lower than in spring (April) and autumn (September), apparently leading to a potential forage quality deficit. The summer behavioural pattern with short sward preference coincided with the relatively higher crude protein content of short swards as compared to tall swards in this period, and with higher intraspecific competition, due to significantly larger numbers of animals present in summer. In autumn, rabbit densities decreased, while crude protein content of both short and tall vegetation increased to a higher, though not significantly different level, comparable with spring crude protein content. In those conditions, significant preference for low vegetation height could no longer be detected. Data suggest that selection for nutritive quality appears when intraspecific competition is high and nutritive quality remains under a certain threshold value. When, in autumn, competition decreases and nutritive quality increases again, short sward preference disappears. We conclude that short sward preference is primarily caused by the better forage quality of re-growth in periods of forage quality limitation, while this preference disappears when forage quality limitation no longer occurs.

References

AOAC (1990). Official methods of analysis. 15 edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, USA.

Bakker ES & Olff H (2003). Impact of different-sized herbivores on recruitment opportunities for subordinate herbs in grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14:465-474.

Bakker ES, Reiffers RC, Olff H & Gleichman JM (2005). Experimental manipulation of predation risk and food quality: effect on grazing behaviour in a central-place foraging herbivore. Oecologia, 146:157-167.

de Blas C & Mateos GG (1998). Feed formulation. In: de Blas C & Wiseman J (Eds.), The nutrition of the rabbit. CABI publishing, New York, USA.

Dekker JJA (2007). Rabbits, refuges and resources. How foraging of herbivores is affected by living in burrows. PhD dissertation. Page 144 pp. Wageningen Universiteit, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Dekker JJA, Broekhuijse MLWJ, De Boer WF, van Langevelde F, Van Wieren SE & Prins HHT (2007). Grazing gradients around refuges of small herbivores are caused by spatial variation in vigilance. Wageningen Universiteit, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Dekker JJA & van Langevelde F (2007). Plant productivity and free-ranging herbivores impact spatial foraging patterns and population dynamics of refuge-living herbivores. Wageningen Universiteit, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Demment MW & Vansoest PJ (1985). A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. American Naturalist, 125:641-672.

Drent RH, Van der Wal R (1999). Cyclic grazing in vertebrates and the manipulation of the food source. In: Olff H, Brown VK & Drent RH (Eds.) Herbivores: between plants and predators. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 271-299.

Durant D, Fritz H, Blais S & Duncan P (2003). The functional response in three species of herbivorous Anatidae: effects of sward height, body mass and bill size. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72: 220-231.

Fox AD, Kristiansen JN, Stroud DA & Boyd H (1998). The effects of simulated spring goose grazing on the growth rate and protein content of Phleum pratense leaves. Oecologia, 116: 154-159.

Givens DI, De Boever JL & Deaville FR (1997). The principles, practices and some future applications of near infrared spectroscopy for predicting the nutritive value of foods for animals and humans. Nutrition research reviews, 10: 83-114.

Gross JE, Shipley LA, Hobbs NT, Spalinger DE & Wunder BA (1993). Functional response of herbivores in food-concentrated patches - tests of a mechanistic model. Ecology, 74: 778-791.

Holmes WG (1991). Predation risk affects foraging behaviour of pikas: observational and experimental evidence. Animal Behaviour, 42: 111-119

Iason GR, Manso T, Sim DA & Hartley FG (2002). The functional response does not predict the local distribution of European Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) on grass swards: experimental evidence. Functional Ecology, 16: 394-402.

Kotler, BP & Blaustein L (1995). Titrating food and safety in a heterogeneous environment: When are the risky and safe patches of equal value? Oikos, 74: 251-258.

Li CL, Hao XY, Willms WD, Zhao ML & Han GD (2010). Effect of long-term cattle grazing on seasonal nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in range forage species in the fescue grassland of southwestern Alberta. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 173: 946-951.

Lima SL & Dill L (1990). Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68: 619-640.

Lombardi L, Fernandez N, Moreno S & Villafuerte R (2003). Habitat-related differences in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) abundance, distribution, and activity. Journal of Mammalogy, 84: 26-36.

Lundberg P (1988). Functional-response of a small mammalian herbivore - the disk equation revisited. Journal of Animal Ecology, 57: 999-1006.

Lundberg P & Astrom M (1990). Functional-response of optimally foraging herbivores. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144: 367-377.

MacArthur RH & Pianka ER (1966). On the optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist, 100: 603-609.

Mayhew P & Houston D (1999). Effects of winter and early spring grazing by Wigeon Anas penelope on their food supply. Ibis, 141: 80-84.

Martins H, Milne JA & Rego F (2002). Seasonal and spatial variation in the diet of the wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) in Portugal. Journal of Zoology, 258: 395-404.

Olff H, Ritchie ME & Prins HHT (2002). Global environmental controls of diversity in large herbivores. Nature, 415: 901-904.

Palomares F (2001). Comparison of 3 methods to estimate rabbit abundance in a Mediterranean environment. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29: 578-585.

Pavlů V, Hejcman M, Pavlů L, Gaisler J & Nezerkova P (2006). Effect of continuous grazing on forage quality, quantity and animal performance. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 113: 349-355.

Peitz DG, Lochmiller RL, Leslie DM & Engle DM (1997). Protein quality of cottentail rabbit forages following rangeland disturbance. Journal of Range Management, 50: 450-458.

Pontes LS, Carrere P, Andueza D, Louault F & Soussana JF (2007). Seasonal productivity and nutritive value of temperate grasses found in semi-natural pastures in Europe: responses to cutting frequency and N supply. Grass and Forage Science, 62: 485-496.

R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Rueda M, Rebollo S & Bravo LG (2008). Age and season determine European rabbit habitat use in Mediterranean ecosystems. Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology, 34: 266-273.

Somers N, D’Haese B, Bossuyt B, Lens L & Hoffmann M (2008). Food quality affects diet preference of rabbits: experimental evidence. Belgian Journal of Zoology, 138: 170-176.

Stephens DW & Krebbs JR (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Stewart KEJ, Bourn NAD & Thomas JA (2001). An evaluation of three quick methods commonly used to assess sward height in ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38: 1148-1154.

van de Koppel J, Huisman J, vanderWal R & Olff H (1996). Patterns of herbivory along a productivity gradient: An empirical and theoretical investigation. Ecology, 77: 736-745.

van Langevelde F, Drescher M, Heitkonig IMA & Prins HHT (2008). Instantaneous intake rate of herbivores as function of forage quality and mass: Effects on facilitative and competitive interactions. Ecological Modelling, 213: 273-284.

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB & Lewis BA (1991). Methods for Dietary Fibre, Neutral Detergent Fibre, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583-3597.

Villafuerte R, Kufner MB, Delibes M & Moreno S (1993). Environmental factors influencing the seasonal daily activity of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in a mediterranean area. Mammalia, 57: 341-347.

Von Holst D, Hutzelmeyer H, Kaetzke P, Khaschei M, Rödel HG & Schrutka H (2002). Social rank, fecundity and lifetime reproductive success in wild European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 51(3): 245-254.

Wood DH (1988). Estimating rabbit density by counting dung pellets. Australian Wildlife Research, 15: 665-671.