First record of the alien hooked mussel Ischadium recurvum (Rafinesque, 1820) (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) in Belgium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26496/bjz.2022.105Keywords:
Ischadium recurvum, non-native, invasive, hooked mussel, BelgiumAbstract
Short notes don’t have an abstract.
References
1. Abbott R.T. & Morris P.A. (2001). A field guide to shells: Atlantic and Gulf Coasts and the West Indies. Vol. 3. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 512 pp.
2. NEMESIS (2022). Chesapeake Bay introduced species database. Available from https://invasions.si.edu/nemesis/CH-ECO.jsp?Species_name=Ischadium+recurvum [accessed 31 January 2022].
3. Allen J.F. (1960). Effect of low salinity on survival of the curved mussel, Brachidontes recurvus. The Nautilus 74: 1–8.
4. Montagna P.A., Estevez E.D., Palmer T.A. & Flannery M.S. (2008). Meta-analysis of the relationship between salinity and molluscs in tidal river estuaries of southwest Florida, USA. American Malacological Bulletin 24 (1–2): 101–115. https://doi.org/10.4003/0740-2783-24.1.101
5. Kennedy V.S. (2011). Biology of the uncommon dreissenid bivalve Mytilopsis leucophaeata (Conrad, 1831) in central Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Molluscan Studies 77: 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyr002
6. Bergquist D.C., Hale J.A., Baker P. & Baker S.M. (2006). Development of ecosystem indicators for the Suwannee River estuary: Oyster reef habitat quality along a salinity gradient. Estuaries and Coasts 29: 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784985
7. Rodney W.S. & Paynter K.T. (2006). Comparisons of macrofaunal assemblages on restored and non-restored oyster reefs in mesohaline regions of Chesapeake Bay in Maryland. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 335 (1): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.02.017
8. Poirrier M.A. & Caputo C.E. (2015). Rangia cuneata clam decline in Lake Pontchartrain from 2001 to 2014 due to an El Niño Southern Oscillation shift coupled with a period of high hurricane intensity and frequency. Gulf and Caribbean Research 26 (1): 9–20. https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.2601.04
9. Lipcius R.N. & Burke R.P. (2018). Successful recruitment, survival and long-term persistence of eastern oyster and hooked mussel on a subtidal, artificial restoration reef system in Chesapeake Bay. PloS ONE 13 (10): e0204329. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204329
10. Ebersole E.L. & Kennedy V.S. (1995). Prey preferences of blue crabs Callinectes sapidus feeding on three bivalve species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 118 (1/3): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps118167
11. Wells-berlin A.M., Perry M.C., Kohn R.A., Paynter K.T. Jr. & Ottinger M.A. (2015). Composition, shell strength, and metabolizable energy of Mulinia lateralis and Ischadium recurvum as food for wintering surf scoters (Melanitta perspicillata). PloS ONE 10 (5): e0119839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119839
12. Gedan K.B., Kellogg L. & Breitburg D.L. (2014). Accounting for multiple foundation species in oyster reef restoration benefits. Restoration Ecology 22 (4): 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12107
13. Galimany E., Lunt J., Domingos A. & Paul V.J. (2018). Feeding behavior of the native mussel Ischadium recurvum and the invasive mussels Mytella charruana and Perna viridis in FL, USA, across a salinity gradient. Estuaries and Coasts 41 (8): 2378–2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-018-0431-6
14. Galimany E., Lunt J., Freeman C.J., Segura-García I., Mossop M., Domingos A., Houk J. & Paul V.J. (2021). Bivalve feeding on the brown tide Aureoumbra lagunensis in a shallow coastal environment. Frontiers in Marine Science 8: 714816. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.714816
15. Allen J.F. (1962). Gonad development and spawning of Brachidontes recurvus in Chesapeake Bay. The Nautilus 76 (1): 9–16.
16. Shaw W.N. (1965). Seasonal setting patterns of five species of bivalves in the Tred Avon River, Maryland. Chesapeake Science 6: 33–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1350620
17. Chanley P. (1970). Larval development of the hooked mussel, Brachidontes recurvus Rafinesque (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) including a literature review of the larval characteristics of the Mytilidae (1970). Proceedings of the National Shellfisheries Association 60: 86–94.
18. Goud J., de Bruyne R., Offermans R., Melchers M. & Nijland R. (2019). Gebogen traliemossel Ischadium recurvum (Rafinesque, 1820) leeft mogelijk al sinds 2012 in het Noordzeekanaal. Spirula 418: 17–21.
19. Meire P., Ysebaert T., Van Damme S., Van den Bergh E., Maris T. & Struyf E. (2005). The Scheldt estuary: a description of a changing ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 540: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-0896-8
20. Boito L., Van den Neucker T., Van Pelt D., Maris T., Van Damme S. & Schoelynck J. (2022). Ecologisch Potentieel in de dokken van de Antwerpse haven. Rapport ECOBE 021-R279, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen. 46 pp.
21. EC. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327: 1–72.
22. Gabriels W., Lock K., De Pauw N. & Goethals P.L.M. (2010). Multimetric Macroinvertebrate Index Flanders (MMIF) for biological assessment of rivers and lakes in Flanders (Belgium). Limnologica 40 (3): 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2009.10.001
23. Kerckhof F., Haelters J. & Gollasch S. (2007). Alien species in the marine and brackish ecosystem: the situation in Belgian waters. Aquatic Invasions 2 (3): 243–257. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2007.2.3.9
24. Boets P., Brosens D., Lock K., Adriaens T., Aelterman B., Mertens J. & Goethals P.L.M. (2016). Alien macroinvertebrates in Flanders (Belgium). Aquatic Invasions 11 (2): 131–144. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2016.11.2.03
25. Pals A. & Vercoutere B. (2008). Bepalen van het Maximaal Ecologisch Potentieel en het Goed Ecologisch Potentieel voor het waterlichaam Antwerpse Havendokken en Schelde-Rijn verbinding K 2086. 17965/R/873173/Mech. 109 pp.
26. De Schamphelaere K., Teuchies J., Bervoets L., Ysebaert T., Blust R. & Meire P. (2020). Opstellen van een triademethode voor de classificatie van waterbodems in brak en zout milieu. Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen. 217 pp.
27. Gittenberger A., Rensing M., Wesdorp K.H. & D’Hont A. (2018). Monitoring non-native species in the port of Antwerp in 2017 conform the joint HELCOM/OSPAR port survey protocol. GiMaRIS rapport 2018_01. 48 pp.
28. Gmelig Meyling A. & de Bruyne R. (2020). De gebogen traliemossel lijkt zich nog niet uit te breiden. Kijk op Exoten 9 (2): 2–3.
29. Lee A. & Ramster J. (1968). The hydrography of the North Sea. A review of our knowledge in relation to pollution problems. Helgoland Marine Research 17: 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01611211
30. Sündermann J. & Pohlmann T. (2011). A brief analysis of North Sea physics. Oceanologia 53 (3): 663–689. https://doi.org/10.5697/oc.53-3.663
31. Wolff W.J. (1998). Exotic invaders of the meso-oligohaline zone of estuaries in the Netherlands: why are there so many? Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 52 (3–4): 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908913
32. Verween A., Vincx M. & Degraer S. (2007). Mytilopsis leucophaeata: The brackish water equivalent of Dreissena polymorpha? A review. In: Verween A. (2007). Biological Knowledge as a Tool for an Ecologically Sound Biofouling Control: A Case Study of the Invasive Bivalve Mytilopsis leucophaeata in Europe: 29–43. PhD Thesis, Universiteit Gent.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All published papers will be put on-line as high resolution PDF’s. Copyright thus remains with the authors. All manuscripts will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
