Temporal patterns in Cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) mother and pup attraction calls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26496/bjz.2022.103Keywords:
rhythmicity, vocal communication, pinniped, parent-offspring contact, maternal care, energy expenditureAbstract
Vocal recognition is widespread in the animal kingdom, and a necessary tool for offspring survival in some groups. Temporal patterns of animal vocalisations can facilitate communication and convey information such as identity, emotional state, or motivation of the caller. While pinniped (i.e., walrus, eared and true seals) vocalisations are generally well studied, and captive pinnipeds show strong timing abilities, little is known about the temporal structure of their calls in the wild. Here, we followed Cape fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) during spontaneous search efforts at the Cape Cross Seal Reserve in Namibia. To investigate the temporal and rhythmic patterning of Cape fur seal attraction calls, we analysed call bouts of 80 mothers and 148 pups. We assessed the relative vocal efforts undertaken by mothers and pups by calculating calling rates, inter-call intervals (periods of silence between vocalisations), and the total time spent calling per bout. To explore the rhythmic structure of the calls, we visualised their temporal patterns by plotting the calling events and frequency histograms of the inter-onset-intervals between each two consecutive vocalisations in a bout. A normalized Pairwise Variability Index was calculated for each individual to investigate underlying patterns and compared between mothers and pups. Pups produced more calls per search, vocalised at higher rates, and took shorter breaks between consecutive vocalisations than females. Even though female vocalisations were much longer, there was no significant difference in the total time females and pups spent vocalising per bout. All animals vocalised at seemingly random intervals, with no distinguishable rhythmic pattern, suggesting that these do not encode identity information during mother-pup reunions. However, numerical analysis showed a potential asynchronous patterning within the age classes, possibly used in anti-masking. Our results indicate that Cape fur seal females and pups invest their energy differently during a search, and while their total calling effort is comparable, reunions seem to be driven mostly by the young.References
Babiszewska M., Schel A.M., Wilke C. & Slocombe K.E. (2015). Social, contextual, and individual factors affecting the occurrence and acoustic structure of drumming bouts in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 156 (1): 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22634
Briefer E.F. (2012). Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of production and evidence. Journal of Zoology 288 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00920.x
Burchardt L.S. & Knörnschild M. (2020). Comparison of methods for rhythm analysis of complex animals’ acoustic signals. PLoS Computational Biology 16 (4): e1007755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007755
Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. & Huyvaert K.P. (2010). AIC model selection and multimodal interence in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65: 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6
Charrier I. (2020). Mother-offspring vocal recognition and social system in pinnipeds. In: Mathevon N. & Aubin T. (eds) Coding Strategies in Vertebrate Acoustic Communication: 231–246. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39200-0_9
Charrier I. & Harcourt R.G. (2006). Individual vocal identity in mother and pup Australian sea lions (Neophoca cinerea). Journal of Mammalogy 87 (5): 929–938. https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-344R3.1
Charrier I., Mathevon N. & Jouventin P. (2001). Mother’s voice recognition by seal pups. Nature 412 (6850): 873–873. https://doi.org/10.1038/35091136
Charrier I., Mathevon N. & Jouventin,P. (2002). How does a fur seal mother recognize the voice of her pup? An experimental study of Arctocephalus tropicalis. Journal of Experimental Biology 205 (5): 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.205.5.603
Charrier I., Mathevon N. & Jouventin P. (2003). Individuality in the voice of fur seal females: an analysis study of the pup attraction call in Arctocephalus tropicalis. Marine Mammal Science 19 (1): 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2003.tb01099.x
Collins K.T., Mcgreevy P.D., Wheatley K.E. & Harcourt R.G. (2011). The influence of behavioural context on Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii) airborne mother-pup vocalisation. Behavioural Processes 87 (3): 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.06.005
Cusano D.A., Indeck K.L., Noad M.J. & Dunlop R.A. (2020). Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) social call production reflects both motivational state and arousal. Bioacoustics 31 (1): 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2020.1858450
David J.H. & Rand R.W. (1986). Attendance behaviour of South African fur seals. In: Kooyman G.L. & Genry R.L. (eds) Fur Seals: Maternal Strategies on Land and at Sea: 126–141. University Press, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400854691.126
Deecke V.B., Ford J.K. & Slater P.J. (2005). The vocal behaviour of mammal-eating killer whales: communicating with costly calls. Animal Behaviour 69 (2): 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.04.014
De Heer Kloots M., Carlson D., Garcia M., Kotz S., Lowry A., Poli-Nardi L., De Reus K., Rubio-Garcia A., Sroka M., Varola M. & Ravignani A. (2020). Rhythmic perception, production and interactivity in harbour and grey seals. EvoLang XIII, Brussels, 14 April 2020–17 April 2020.
De Villiers D.J. & Roux J.P. (1992). Mortality of newborn pups of the South African fur seal Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus in Namibia. South African Journal of Marine Science 12 (1): 881–889. https://doi.org/10.2989/02577619209504749
Doidge D.W. & Croxall J.P. (1983). Density-dependent pup mortality in the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella at South Georgia. Journal of Zoology 202 (3): 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1984.tb05095.x
Fernández-Vargas M. & Johnston R.E. (2015). Ultrasonic vocalizations in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) reveal modest sex differences and nonlinear signals of sexual motivation. PloS ONE 10 (2): e0116789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116789
Gamel C.M., Davis R.W., David J.H., Meÿer M.A. & Brandon E. (2005). Reproductive energetics and female attendance patterns of Cape fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) during early lactation. The American Midland Naturalist 153 (1): 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2005)153[0152:REAFAP]2.0.CO;2
Gero S., Whitehead H. & Rendell L. (2016). Individual, unit and vocal clan level identity cues in sperm whale codas. Royal Society Open Science 3 (1): 150372. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150372
Gisiner R. & Schusterman R.J. (1991). California sea lion pups play an active role in reunions with their mothers. Animal Behaviour 41 (2): 364–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80488-9
Grabe E. & Low E.L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Laboratory Phonology 7: 515–546. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197105.2.515
Heinrich T., Ravignani A. & Hanke F.H. (2020). Visual timing abilities of a harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) and a South African fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) for sub-and supra-second time intervals. Animal Cognition 23 (5): 851–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01390-3
Holt M.M., Noren D.P., Dunkin R.C. & Williams T.M. (2015). Vocal performance affects metabolic rate in dolphins: implications for animals communicating in noisy environments. Journal of Experimental Biology 218 (11): 1647–1654. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.122424
Insley S.J. (1992). Mother-offspring separation and acoustic stereotypy: a comparison of call morphology in two species of pinnipeds. Behaviour 120 (1–2): 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853992X00237
Insley S.J. (2001). Mother–offspring vocal recognition in northern fur seals is mutual but asymmetrical. Animal Behaviour 61 (1): 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1569
Insley S., Phillips A.V. & Charrier I. (2003). A review of social recognition in pinnipeds. Aquatic Mammals 29 (2): 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1578/016754203101024149
Kershenbaum A., Blumstein D.T., Roch M.A., Akçay Ç., Backus G., Bee M.A., Bohn K., Cao Y., Carter G., Cäsar C., Coen M., Deruiter S.L., Doyle L., Edelman S., Ferrer-I-Cancho R., Freeberg T.M., Garland E.C., Gustison M., Harley H.E., Huetz C., Hughes M., Hyland Bruno J., Ilany A., Jin D.Z., Johnson M., Ju C., Karnowski J., Lohr B., Manser M.B., Mccowan B., Mercado E., Narins P.M., Piel A., Rice M., Salmi R., Sasahara K., Sayigh L., Shiu Y., Taylor C., Vallejo E.E., Waller S. & Zamora-Gutierrez V. (2016). Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus. Biological Reviews 91 (1): 13–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12160
Kirkman S.P. & Arnould J.P. (2018). Cape and Australian Fur Seals: Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus and A. p. doriferus. In: Würsig B., Thewissen J.G.M. & Kovacs K.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals: 158–161. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804327-1.00083-2
Kirkman S.P., Oosthuizen W.H., Meÿer M.A., Kotze P.G.H., Roux J.P. & Underhill L.G. (2007). Making sense of censuses and dealing with missing data: trends in pup counts of Cape fur seal Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus for the period 1972–2004. African Journal of Marine Science 29 (2): 161–176. https://doi.org/10.2989/AJMS.2007.29.2.2.185
Kirkman S.P., Yemane D., Oosthuizen W.H., Meÿer M.A., Kotze P.G.H., Skrypzeck H.L., Vaz Velho F. & Underhill L.G. (2013). Spatio-temporal shifts of the dynamic Cape fur seal population in southern Africa, based on aerial censuses (1972–2009). Marine Mammal Science 29 (3): 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2012.00584.x
Martin M., Gridley T., Elwen S.H. & Charrier I. (2021a). Vocal repertoire, micro-geographical variation and within-species acoustic partitioning in a highly colonial pinniped, the Cape fur seal. Royal Society Open Science 8 (10): 202241. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202241
Martin M., Gridley T., Elwen S.H. & Charrier I. (2021b). Extreme ecological constraints lead to high degree of individual stereotypy in the vocal repertoire of the Cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 75 (7): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03043-y
Martin M., Gridley T., Elwen S.H. & Charrier I. (2022). Feel the beat: cape fur seal males encode their arousal state in their bark rate. The Science of Nature 109 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-021-01778-2
Mathevon N., Casey C., Reichmuth C. & Charrier I. (2017). Northern elephant seals memorize the rhythm and timbre of their rivals’ voices. Current Biology 27 (15): 2352–2356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.035
Mattlin R.H. (1978). Pup mortality of the New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri Lesson). New Zealand Journal of Ecology 1: 138–144.
McCarty J.P. (1996). The energetic cost of begging in nestling passerines. The Auk 113 (1): 178–188. https://doi.org/10.2307/4088944
Oftedal O.T. & Gittleman J.L. (1989). Patterns of energy output during reproduction in carnivores. In: Gittleman J.L. (ed.) Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution: 355–378. Springer, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4716-4_14
Osiecka A.N., Fearey J., Elwen S. & Gridley T. (2020). Prolonged nursing in Cape fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) at Cape Cross colony, Namibia. African Zoology 55 (3): 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2020.1768144
Phillips A.V. (2003). Behavioral cues used in reunions between mother and pup South American fur seals (Arctocephalus australis). Journal of Mammalogy 84 (2): 524–535. https://doi.org/bd7b96
Phillips A.V. & Stirling I. (2000). Vocal individuality in mother and pup South American fur seals, Arctocephalus australis. Marine Mammal Science 16 (3): 592–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2000.tb00954.x
Pitcher B.J., Harcourt R.G. & Charrier I. (2010). Rapid onset of maternal vocal recognition in a colonially breeding mammal, the Australian sea lion. PLoS ONE 5 (8): e12195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012195
Pitcher B.J., Harcourt R.G., Schaal B. & Charrier I. (2011). Social olfaction in marine mammals: wild female Australian sea lions can identify their pup’s scent. Biology Letters 7 (1): 60–62. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0569
Pitcher B.J., Briefer E.F., Vannoni E. & McElligott A.G. (2014). Fallow bucks attend to vocal cues of motivation and fatigue. Behavioral Ecology 25 (2): 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art131
Ravignani A. (2018). Spontaneous rhythms in a harbor seal pup calls. BMC Research Notes 11 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3107-6
Ravignani A. (2019). Timing of antisynchronous calling: A case study in a harbor seal pup (Phoca vitulina). Journal of Comparative Psychology 133 (2): 272. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000160
Ravignani A. & Norton P. (2017). Measuring rhythmic complexity: a primer to quantify and compare temporal structure in speech, movement, and animal vocalizations. Journal of Language Evolution 2 (1): 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzx002
Ravignani A., Bowling D.L. & Fitch W. (2014). Chorusing, synchrony, and the evolutionary functions of rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01118
Ravignani A., Kello C.T., De Reus K., Kotz S.A., Dalla Bella S., Méndez-Aróstegui M., Rapado-Tamarit B., Rubio-Garcia A. & De Boer B. (2019). Ontogeny of vocal rhythms in harbor seal pups: an exploratory study. Current Zoology 65 (1): 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy055
Sanvito S. & Galimberti F. (2000). Bioacoustics of southern elephant seals. II. Individual and geographical variation in male aggressive vocalisations. Bioacoustics 10 (4): 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2000.9753439
Sanvito S., Galimberti F. & Miller E.H. (2007). Vocal signalling of male southern elephant seals is honest but imprecise. Animal Behaviour 73 (2): 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.08.005
Schusterman R.J. (1977). Temporal patterning in sea lion barking (Zalophus californianus). Behavioral Biology 20 (3): 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6773(77)90964-6
Serrano A. & Terhune J.M. (2002). Antimasking aspects of harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) underwater vocalizations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (6): 3083–3090. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1518987
Trillmich F. (1981). Mutual mother-pup recognition in Galapagos fur seals and sea lions: cues used and functional significance. Behaviour 78 (1–2): 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853981X00248
Trimble M. & Charrier I. (2011). Individuality in South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) mother–pup vocalizations: Implications of ecological constraints and geographical variations? Mammalian Biology 76 (2): 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2010.10.009
Trimble M. & Insley S.J. (2010). Mother-offspring reunion in the South American sea lion Otaria flavescens at Isla de Lobos (Uruguay): use of spatial, acoustic and olfactory cues. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 22 (3): 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2010.502318
Tripovich J.S., Canfield R., Rogers T.L. & Arnould J.P. (2008). Characterization of Australian fur seal vocalizations during the breeding season. Marine Mammal Science 24 (4): 913–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00229.x
Trivers R.L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist 14 (1): 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/14.1.249
Warneke R.M. & Shaughnessy P.D. (1985). Arctocephalus pusillus, the South African and Australian fur seal: taxonomy, evolution, biogeography, and life history. In: Ling J.K. & Bryden M.M. (eds) Studies of Sea Mammals in South Latitudes: 53–77. South Australian Museum, Sydney.
Wartzok D. & Ketten D.R. (1999). Marine mammals sensory systems. In: Reynolds iii J.R. & Rommel S.A. (eds) Biology of Marine Mammals: 117–175. The Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London.
Weary D.M. & Fraser D. (1995). Signalling need: costly signals and animal welfare assessment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44 (2–4): 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00611-U
Wierucka K., Pitcher B.J., Harcourt R. & Charrier I. (2017). The role of visual cues in mother-pup reunions in a colonially breeding mammal. Biology Letters 13 (11): 20170444.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All published papers will be put on-line as high resolution PDF’s. Copyright thus remains with the authors. All manuscripts will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
